<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: References</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mixeduseparty.com/wp/?feed=rss2&#038;page_id=48" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mixeduseparty.com/wp</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: destroy</title>
		<link>http://mixeduseparty.com/wp/?page_id=48#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>destroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixeduseparty.wordpress.com/?page_id=48#comment-99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Azathioprine - Crohn&#039;s Disease Forum - Support group and ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Azathioprine &#8211; Crohn&#8217;s Disease Forum &#8211; Support group and &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mixeduseparty</title>
		<link>http://mixeduseparty.com/wp/?page_id=48#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>mixeduseparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixeduseparty.wordpress.com/?page_id=48#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good point about the Certificate of Occupancy issue.

Co-ops are subject to both the zoning code and the historical district rules. Both allow for repairs, but the zoning code forbids reconstruction of destroyed or inactive non-conforming uses. The line between &quot;repaired&quot; and &quot;structurally altered so as to prolong the life of the building&quot; is unclear, but a non-conforming co-op that is destroyed or out of use for a year cannot be rebuilt or re-occupied. This happened when AK Stevens House burned down in 2004. The relevant sections of the city code are Chapter 55 5:86 Use Non-Conformance and Chapter 103 Historical Preservation.

Black Elk, Lester, Debs, and Robert Owen are not in a historical district. 

Inside and outside historical districts, new co-ops are forbidden in zones below R2B, and in houses smaller than 5000 square feet, along with the other restrictions listed in the post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the Certificate of Occupancy issue.</p>
<p>Co-ops are subject to both the zoning code and the historical district rules. Both allow for repairs, but the zoning code forbids reconstruction of destroyed or inactive non-conforming uses. The line between &#8220;repaired&#8221; and &#8220;structurally altered so as to prolong the life of the building&#8221; is unclear, but a non-conforming co-op that is destroyed or out of use for a year cannot be rebuilt or re-occupied. This happened when AK Stevens House burned down in 2004. The relevant sections of the city code are Chapter 55 5:86 Use Non-Conformance and Chapter 103 Historical Preservation.</p>
<p>Black Elk, Lester, Debs, and Robert Owen are not in a historical district. </p>
<p>Inside and outside historical districts, new co-ops are forbidden in zones below R2B, and in houses smaller than 5000 square feet, along with the other restrictions listed in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Wineberg</title>
		<link>http://mixeduseparty.com/wp/?page_id=48#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Wineberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mixeduseparty.wordpress.com/?page_id=48#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost all the non-conforming co-ops you mention are in historic districts, particularly the Old Fourth Ward. Many have been altered in the last decade with the co-ops working with the city Historic District Commission. The historic district rules trump zoning rules I believe.  Additions and changes are allowed within the city&#039;s ordinance. I think all sides have been very positive about the changes. Some of the co-ops have won awards for outstanding rehabilitation.

Another issue you might investigate: how many landlords operate without current COs (Certificate of Occupancy). In the case of two recent fires, neither of the properties had valid COs.  This is disturbing. As a resident of the Old Fourth Ward and an owner of rental property, I feel that not having valid COs endangers occupants and should be checked into.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost all the non-conforming co-ops you mention are in historic districts, particularly the Old Fourth Ward. Many have been altered in the last decade with the co-ops working with the city Historic District Commission. The historic district rules trump zoning rules I believe.  Additions and changes are allowed within the city&#8217;s ordinance. I think all sides have been very positive about the changes. Some of the co-ops have won awards for outstanding rehabilitation.</p>
<p>Another issue you might investigate: how many landlords operate without current COs (Certificate of Occupancy). In the case of two recent fires, neither of the properties had valid COs.  This is disturbing. As a resident of the Old Fourth Ward and an owner of rental property, I feel that not having valid COs endangers occupants and should be checked into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
